I heard the radiation comes from the antenna.
True, when you make or receive a call, radiation comes off the antenna, half of it goes into space, and the other half forms a band around the side of the head where you place the phone against your ear.
Wave shields do not block that radiation or the radiation that goes through the body of the phone. Our focus is on that portion of EMF that enters the soft tissue of the ear through the ear piece. Why?
Because the ear is the highest absorption rate of radiation in the body and most of the reports of tumors and health problems are directly behind the ear. Thus our testing was only on radiation entering the inner ear. There is still radiation on the side of the head so using a gauss meter type device to measure changes will not show any real change because of the presence of radiation on the side of the head.
We also have testing from Cetecom, Germany, and the Russian health department who tested and approved the Waveshield for sale in the federation of Russia.
Kinesiologists do a muscle test with Waveshield to prove energy levels are lowered when you use a cell phone. When you use your cell phone your energy level goes down so if you hold you arm out and resist your arm can be pushed down very easily. With the Waveshield on the ear piece your energy level stays strong so the same test no one can push your arm down with out great effort. There are editorials from major newspapers endorsing Waveshield products.
How was the Wave shield tested?
The Wave shields were tested by a U.S. govt. FTC listed lab on several phone models with the following results.
WS series 1000 for cell phones and series 3000 for cordless phones block up to 97% of the radiation from entering the inner ear and series 2000 gold blocks up to 99%. We say “up to” because of 2 factors 1. The strength of the microwave signal to your phone.
2. Some phones have more radiation than others.
What about other shields, chips etc. claiming to absorb, block, convert radiation?
Most of these products have no valid testing from approved labs. Many make very general claims which can not be proved. If they “absorbed” the radiation would they not get saturated? If they neutralized/ harmonized ALL the radiation they would interfere with reception and block the signal from the antenna. These “phone decorations” offer no protection.
I have not heard any news or reports about cell phones not being safe.
Although the jury is still out on the long term effects of cell phones and cordless phones, studies and evidence continue to support the growing potential health risks. An independent reporting site www.cprnews.com has over 170 reports and studies on cell phone dangers under world news.
Why has the government not done very much about his potential health problem?
The govt. listens to the cell phone manufacturers who tell them phones are safe and shields do not work. Yet a report from major newspapers in England confirmed that the cell phone industry has a patent to put a shield inside phones. Now why would they do that if phones are safe and shields do not work? They have had this patent since June/01. They have not put a shield in phones because of potential law suites.
Is there a warranty on the shields?
Yes, one year which is only voided if you try and remove the wave shield from one phone to apply to another phone. The adhesive could rip off and the special surface metallic coating on the shield could be damaged.
I use a headset so why do I need a shield?
Well first we want you protected at all times when you are not using a safe headset but mainly because the current headsets with the wire from the ear bud are very dangerous. Studies and research have shown that the wire from the ear bud acts like an aerial bringing 3 x more radiation to the ear—they are very dangerous.
